The new way to authentic book writing
Your ideas, developed into your book, in your own voice.
Everything a ghostwriter gives an author — reading your draft closely, telling you what is wrong with it, and tracking whether it is getting better — except the writing. That stays yours.
No account needed — not now, not later. Signing in with Google is optional and gives you an identity, nothing more: it does not sync or back up your work, which is saved in this browser, on this device. What that means for you.
The problem is not the blank page
You can write a book in a notepad. What is hard is knowing whether forty thousand words still argue one thesis, still sound like you, and still hold up against a field that moved while you were writing.
Tools that offer to write it for you solve a problem you do not have, and create one you cannot see: prose that reads fluently and sounds like nobody. A publisher can tell. That is the rejection this product exists to prevent.
What it actually does
Marks the sentences, not the document
Machine-pattern findings appear at their span in your text, each opening to the rule, the matched phrase, the reason, and a suggested replacement.
You answer back
Three verdicts, and they persist: I’ll change it, I meant this, not a rule for me. A gate you cannot argue with is a lecture.
Paste from anywhere
Smart quotes, em dashes, invisible characters and the Cyrillic lookalikes that break a publisher’s toolchain — converted on arrival, named, and undoable.
Four measures. Never averaged.
Voice, originality, accuracy and continuity each carry their own threshold and their own verdict. They are never combined into a single number, and never will be.
One of them reports today: originality. It is the only measure that works from a cold start — voice needs a body of your writing to compare against, accuracy needs claims to check, and continuity needs more than one section. Until those exist they say insufficient rather than guessing. Text integrity is a separate check and runs on everything. What is and is not built →
The reason is specific. The project this method came from once scored 97.5 out of a hundred and declared itself ready for a publisher — while that publisher was rejecting the prose. The single figure was measuring the wrong things and hiding the one that mattered. Averaging four numbers is how a manuscript passes a gate and fails a reader.
Below the point where there is enough of your writing to judge, you get a meter, not a number. A confident wrong score destroys trust faster than a missing feature.
$12 a month, or $120 a year
Priced at the market, not above it. See what is included →